Change in status during tribunal proceedings: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Information-header}} A change in status after the application (or reference) but before the hearing can have an effect on whether or not the tribunal proceedings can continu...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
In the cases above, the tribunal will strike out the case under [[Tribunal rule 8]]. However, if a hearing date has already been fixed, it may be possible to keep the original date by exercising the right to apply in the new eligibility period. | In the cases above, the tribunal will strike out the case under [[Tribunal rule 8]]. However, if a hearing date has already been fixed, it may be possible to keep the original date by exercising the right to apply in the new eligibility period. | ||
All the relevant case law can be found here: [[:Category:Change of status after application made]]. | |||
Current LAA guidance is that a change in section type during Tribunal proceedings does not constitute the start of a new matter. See [[The mental health fee scheme]]. | Current LAA guidance is that a change in section type during Tribunal proceedings does not constitute the start of a new matter. See [[The mental health fee scheme]]. |
Revision as of 22:44, 11 October 2020
A change in status after the application (or reference) but before the hearing can have an effect on whether or not the tribunal proceedings can continue.
The tribunal retains jurisdiction in the following circumstances:
- Changes between s2, s3 and CTO following an application under any of those sections (R (M) v South Thames MHRT [1997] EWHC Admin 797M, AA v Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] UKUT 195 (AAC)M).
- Changes between s2, s3 and CTO following a reference made while under any of those sections (KF v Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust [2010] UKUT 185 (AAC)M).
- Transfer from s3 detention to s7 guardianship (AD’A v Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2020] UKUT 110 (AAC)M).
In the cases above, the tribunal hearing will proceed but will consider the criteria relevant to the new section. The patient will still be eligible to apply during the normal eligibility period for the latest section (“two bites of the cherry”).
The tribunal lose jurisdiction in the following circumstances (the sections themselves are explained in chapter 7 below):
- Change from s47/49 to s47 (notional s37) (according to the older case of R (MN) v MHRT [2008] EWHC 3383 (Admin)M).
- Change from s3 to s37 (GM v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust [2020] UKUT 152 (AAC)M).
In the cases above, the tribunal will strike out the case under Tribunal rule 8. However, if a hearing date has already been fixed, it may be possible to keep the original date by exercising the right to apply in the new eligibility period.
All the relevant case law can be found here: Category:Change of status after application made.
Current LAA guidance is that a change in section type during Tribunal proceedings does not constitute the start of a new matter. See The mental health fee scheme.
INFORMATION
- Representation
- Civil sections and CTOs
- Criminal sections
- Aftercare
- Tribunal Rules
- Overriding objective (MHT)
- Applications (MHT)
- Parties (MHT)
- Victims (MHT)
- Representatives (MHT)
- Notice of proceedings, and listing (MHT)
- Medical examination (MHT)
- Remote hearings (MHT)
- Recording of hearings (MHT)
- Disposal without hearing (MHT)
- Hearing in a party’s absence (MHT)
- Decisions by a single judge (MHT)
- Reports (MHT)
- Evidence (MHT)
- Non-disclosure of documents and information (MHT)
- Directions (MHT)
- Adjournment and postponement (MHT)
- Withdrawal (MHT)
- Reinstatement (MHT)
- Decisions (MHT)
- Public hearing (MHT)
- Wasted costs (MHT)
- Appealing against a tribunal decision (MHT)
- Mandatory and discretionary references
- Nearest relative
- Legal Aid
- International law
What links here:
- PS v Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKUT 143 (AAC)
- AD'A v Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2020] UKUT 110 (AAC)
- GM v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust [2020] UKUT 152 (AAC)
- CS v Elysium Healthcare [2021] UKUT 186 (AAC)
- DD v Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2022] UKUT 166 (AAC)
- AC v Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust [2024] UKUT 297 (AAC)