Re KC: LCR v SC (2020) EWCOP 62: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:06, 2 May 2021

Whether to register LPAs (1) The three-stage test in Re J (2010) MHLO 167 (COP) for revocation of an LPA was applied to LPA registration in this case: the LPAs were not registered as the acrimonious relationship among the donees would prevent them from acting in KC's best interests. (2) a panel deputy for property and affairs was appointed, but no personal welfare deputy.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 110, January 2021)

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Deputyship cases🔍 Older deputyship cases can still be found in Category:Other capacity cases
LPA cases - revocation🔍

Date: 29 September 2020🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

Sarah Richardson🔍

Parties:

LCR🔍
SC🔍
AEC🔍
CP🔍
KC🔍

Citation number(s):

[2020] EWCOP 62^B

What links here:

Re J [2010] MHLO 167 (COP)

Published: 12/12/20 10:59

Cached: 2025-08-17 20:27:51

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 |Sentence=Whether to register LPAs
 |Summary=''(1) The three-stage test in [[Re J (2010) MHLO 167 (COP)]] for revocation of an LPA was applied to LPA registration in this case: the LPAs were not registered as the acrimonious relationship among the donees would prevent them from acting in KC's best interests. (2) a panel deputy for property and affairs was appointed, but no personal welfare deputy.''
-|Subject=Deputyship cases,LPA cases - all,LPA cases - revocation
+|Subject=Deputyship cases,LPA cases - revocation
 |News=Yes
 |RSS pubdate=2020/12/12 10:48:32 AM
 }}