| Display title | Re KC: LCR v SC [2020] EWCOP 62 |
| Default sort key | Re KC: LCR v SC (2020) EWCOP 62 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 622 |
| Page ID | 11231 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 10:59, 12 December 2020 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 11:55, 8 October 2021 |
| Total number of edits | 5 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | (1) The three-stage test in Re J (2010) MHLO 167 (COP) for revocation of an LPA was applied to LPA registration in this case: the LPAs were not registered as the acrimonious relationship among the donees would prevent them from acting in KC's best interests. (2) a panel deputy for property and affairs was appointed, but no personal welfare deputy. |
