The Local Authority v A (2019) EWCOP 68: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "{{Case |Date=2019/06/18 |NCN=[2019] EWCOP 68 |Court=Court of Protection |Judges=Moir |Parties=The Local Authority, A, B, The Hospital Trust |Sentence=Capacity |Summary=(1) A l...")
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case
{{Case
|Date=2019/06/18
|Date=2019-06-18
|NCN=[2019] EWCOP 68
|NCN=[2019] EWCOP 68
|Essex issue=128
|Essex page=12
|Court=Court of Protection
|Court=Court of Protection
|Judges=Moir
|Judges=Moir
|Parties=The Local Authority, A, B, The Hospital Trust
|Parties=The Local Authority, A, B, The Hospital Trust
|Judicial history=*[[Re A (Covert Medication: Residence) (2024) EWCA Civ 572]] (CA)
*[[Re A (Covert Medication: Residence) (2024) EWCOP 19]] (Poole J)
*[[Re A (Covert Medication: Closed Proceedings) (2022) EWCOP 44]] (Poole J)
*[[A Local Authority v A (2020) EWCOP 76]] (HHJ Moir)
*Unpublished judgment, 17/6/20 (HHJ Moir)
*[[The Local Authority v A (2019) EWCOP 68]] (HHJ Moir)
|Sentence=Capacity
|Sentence=Capacity
|Summary=(1) A lacked capacity in relation to residence, care, contact, and medical treatment, and to execute an LPA. (2) The LPA was invalid for want of capacity. (3) The living will was similarly invalid as an ADRT, and invalid as an expression of her wishes and feelings as there was good reason to doubt its accuracy. (4) It was in A's best interests to: (a) receive treatment for epilepsy, primary ovarian failure and vitamin D deficiency; and (b) have care and support, and contact with her mother and grandparents, in accordance with the relevant plan and declarations.
|Summary=(1) A lacked capacity in relation to residence, care, contact, and medical treatment, and to execute an LPA. (2) The LPA was invalid for want of capacity. (3) The living will was similarly invalid as an ADRT, and invalid as an expression of her wishes and feelings as there was good reason to doubt its accuracy. (4) It was in A's best interests to: (a) receive treatment for epilepsy, primary ovarian failure and vitamin D deficiency; and (b) have care and support, and contact with her mother and grandparents, in accordance with the relevant plan and declarations.
|Detail===Note==
Published on BAILII on 7/11/22.
|Subject=Medical treatment cases,Other LPA cases
|Subject=Medical treatment cases,Other LPA cases
|News=No
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2023/03/24 09:17:26 PM
|RSS pubdate=2023-03-24 09:17:26 PM
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:24, 14 October 2024

Capacity (1) A lacked capacity in relation to residence, care, contact, and medical treatment, and to execute an LPA. (2) The LPA was invalid for want of capacity. (3) The living will was similarly invalid as an ADRT, and invalid as an expression of her wishes and feelings as there was good reason to doubt its accuracy. (4) It was in A's best interests to: (a) receive treatment for epilepsy, primary ovarian failure and vitamin D deficiency; and (b) have care and support, and contact with her mother and grandparents, in accordance with the relevant plan and declarations.