Information for "39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection update' (issue 6, February 2011)"
Basic information
| Display title | 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection update' (issue 6, February 2011) |
| Default sort key | 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection update' (issue 6, February 2011) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 573 |
| Page ID | 13317 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 20:02, 24 June 2021 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 22:09, 19 March 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 3 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
| Transcluded templates (8) | Templates used on this page:
|
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The cases referred to are: Re AB; D Borough Council v AB (2011) EWHC 101 (COP), Hill v Fellowes Solicitors LLP (2011) EWHC 61 (QB), Haworth v Cartmel and HMRC (2011) EWHC 36 (Ch), GSCC conduct committee decision: Philip Julian Davies 10/12/10. |