Display title | 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection update' (issue 14, October/November 2011) |
Default sort key | 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection update' (issue 14, October/November 2011) |
Page length (in bytes) | 926 |
Page ID | 13309 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 19:51, 24 June 2021 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 22:59, 19 March 2023 |
Total number of edits | 5 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The cases referred to are: Re S; D v R (the deputy of S) (2010) EWHC 3748 (COP), Sharma v Hunters (2011) EWHC 2546 (COP), Re GM; FP v GM and A Health Board (2011) EWHC 2778 (COP), LG v DK (2011) EWHC 2453 (COP), A Local Authority v DL (2010) EWHC 2675 (Fam), R (Sessay) v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2011) EWHC 2617 (QB), DN v Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (2011) UKUT 327 (AAC). Also mentioned is the Law Commission report on kidnapping, which includes a discussion of Re HM; PM v KH (2010) EWHC 870 (Fam). |