Aberdeenshire Council v SF (No 2) [2024] EWCOP 10

Non-recognition of Scottish Guardianship Order The Court of Protection exercised its discretion to refuse to recognise a Scottish Guardianship Order (which authorised SF's mother to consent to deprivation of liberty) because: (1) "(a) the case in which the measure was taken was not urgent, (b) the adult was not given an opportunity to be heard, and (c) that omission amounted to a breach of natural justice" (para 19(3) of sch 3 MCA 2005); (2) "the measure would be inconsistent with a mandatory provision of the law of England and Wales" (para 19(4)(b)), as the breaches of Article 5(1)(e) and Article 5(4) would be unlawful under s6 HRA 1998; and (3) "recognition of the measure would be manifestly contrary to public policy" (para 19(4)(a)), because of the breach of natural justice and the breaches of fundamental human rights under Article 5, 6 and 8.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Other capacity cases🔍

Date: 20/2/24🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judicial history:

Judge(s):

Poole🔍

Parties:

Aberdeenshire Council🔍
SF🔍
EF🔍
Sunderland City Council🔍

Citation number(s):

[2024] EWCOP 10^B

What links here:

Published: 23/11/24 18:16

Cached: 2025-05-29 11:15:29