Open justice | Let us know if you have a tribunal decision you would like to publish (see Re A)
Email updates | CPD scheme

Online forum | Latest topic on forum: Dismissal of a Hospital (Mental Health Act) Panel Manager | News

Re AA (Costs) [2024] EWCOP 44 (T3)

Revision as of 13:25, 14 October 2024 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case |Date=2024-08-29 |NCN=[2024] EWCOP 44 (T3) |Court=Court of Protection |Judges=Henke |Parties=North Central London ICB, AA, MA, IA |Judicial history first case=Re AA (Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: No best interests decision) (2024) EWCOP 39 (T3) |Sentence=Costs |Summary=AA's parents argued that the ICB should pay their costs. |Subject=COP costs cases |News=Yes |RSS pubdate=2024-10-14 01:18:04 PM }}")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Costs AA's parents argued that the ICB should pay their costs.

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

  • COP costs cases🔍

Date: 29/8/24🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judicial history:

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 14/10/24 13:25

Cached: 2025-05-23 06:02:16

Retrieved from "https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Re_AA_(Costs)_(2024)_EWCOP_44_(T3)&oldid=64059"