Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust v JS [2023] EWCOP 33

Revision as of 17:52, 9 April 2024 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case |Date=2023-08-10 |NCN=[2023] EWCOP 33 |Court=Court of Protection |Judges=Theis |Parties=JS, Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust |Judicial history first case=Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust v JS (2023) EWCOP 12 |Sentence=DOLS ineligibility under Case E |Summary=The key questions when considering ineligiblity under Case E are: (1) Is the person a 'mental health patient'? (2) Is the person an 'objecting' mental health patient? (3) Could...")
(diff) โ† Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision โ†’ (diff)
DOLS ineligibility under Case E The key questions when considering ineligiblity under Case E are: (1) Is the person a 'mental health patient'? (2) Is the person an 'objecting' mental health patient? (3) Could the person be detained under s2 or 3 MHA 1983? The judge had been entitled to reach the conclusions he did on the evidence he had.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters: