Re AA (Social media and internet use) [2021] EWCOP 70

Revision as of 16:17, 1 December 2022 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case |Date=2021/12/09 |NCN=[2021] EWCOP 70 |Court=Court of Protection |Judges=Keehan |Parties=A Local Authority, AA |Sentence=Social media and internet use |Summary="In the...")
(diff) โ† Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision โ†’ (diff)
Social media and internet use "In the absence of any evidence, for many months now, of AA putting himself at risk of harm in his use of the internet and social media, I am satisfied that there is insufficient evidence for me to conclude that he lacks capacity to make decisions in respect of his use of the internet and of social media. Even if I am wrong in coming to that conclusion and I ought to find that he does lack capacity, I am entirely satisfied that it is not in his best interests for the daily checks to be undertaken of his electronic devices because: (a) they deliver no evidence of any value and afford no protection to AA; and (b) it is contrary to AA's wishes that those checks are undertaken, which causes him some distress and/or at least uneasiness."

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 9/12/21๐Ÿ”

Court: Court of Protection๐Ÿ”

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 1/12/22 16:17

Cached: 2025-06-23 18:21:38