Riddle v Parker Rhodes Hickmott Solicitors [2022] EWCOP 18

Remuneration of deputy The professional, non-legally-qualified deputy argued that the volume of work, given the size and complexity of the estate, would not adequately be met by the limited local authority rates set out in PD 19B. The court dismissed his appeal, noting that costs which run close to or even exceed the fixed fees constraint do not necessarily establish a basis for an SCCO assessment.

Essex

This case has been summarised on page 18 of 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 123, June 2022).

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

• Deputyship cases🔍 Older deputyship cases can still be found in Category:Other capacity cases

Date: 3/5/22🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

• Hayden🔍

Parties:

• Andrew Riddle🔍
• Parker Rhodes Hickmott Solicitors🔍

Citation number(s):

• [2022] EWCOP 18^B

What links here:

• 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 123, June 2022)

Published: 25/7/22 07:22

Cached: 2025-05-27 20:46:52