Royal Borough of Greenwich v IOSK [2021] EWCOP 65

Revision as of 09:13, 10 January 2022 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case |Date=2021/08/22 |NCN=[2021] EWCOP 65 |Court=Court of Protection |Judges=Hilder |Parties=Royal Borough of Greenwich, IOSK, NK, MOK |Sentence=Coronavirus vaccination |Su...")
(diff) โ† Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision โ†’ (diff)
Coronavirus vaccination It was determined to be in the best interests of IOSK, a 17-year-old male with autism and severe learning disability, to be administered a coronavirus vaccination, despite family objections.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 22/8/21๐Ÿ”

Court: Court of Protection๐Ÿ”

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 10/1/22 09:13

Cached: 2025-05-20 11:54:50