A CCG v AD [2021] EWCOP 47

Revision as of 10:18, 13 September 2021 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case |Date=2021/05/07 |NCN=[2021] EWCOP 47 |Court=Court of Protection |Judges=Brown |Parties=A Clinical Commissioning Group, A CCG, AD, AC |Sentence=Coronavirus vaccination...")
(diff) โ† Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision โ†’ (diff)
Coronavirus vaccination The court decided that it was it was in AD's best interests to be administered two doses of the Oxford coronavirus vaccine: the plan was for a sedative to be given, not only to sedate but also to prevent memory formation, and for a nurse to swiftly enter the room, inject him, then leave, while AD was distracted by his care team. Any booster vaccination, or any care plan involving force, would have to be considered at a future court hearing.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 7/5/21๐Ÿ”

Court: Court of Protection๐Ÿ”

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 13/9/21 10:18

Cached: 2025-06-11 20:59:33