Aberdeenshire Council v SF (2023) EWCOP 28: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Aberdeenshire Council v SF (No 3) (2024) MHLO 3 (COP)" to "Aberdeenshire Council v SF (No 3) (Change of Habitual Residence) (2024) EWCOP 74 (T3)")
 
Line 8: Line 8:
|Parties=Aberdeenshire Council, SF, EF, Sunderland City Council
|Parties=Aberdeenshire Council, SF, EF, Sunderland City Council
|Judicial history=* [[Aberdeenshire Council v SF (No 4) (Residence) (2024) EWCOP 67 (T3)]]
|Judicial history=* [[Aberdeenshire Council v SF (No 4) (Residence) (2024) EWCOP 67 (T3)]]
* [[Aberdeenshire Council v SF (No 3) (2024) MHLO 3 (COP)]]
* [[Aberdeenshire Council v SF (No 3) (Change of Habitual Residence) (2024) EWCOP 74 (T3)]]
* [[Aberdeenshire Council v SF (No 2) (2024) EWCOP 10]]
* [[Aberdeenshire Council v SF (No 2) (2024) EWCOP 10]]
* [[Aberdeenshire Council v SF (2023) EWCOP 28]]
* [[Aberdeenshire Council v SF (2023) EWCOP 28]]

Latest revision as of 21:11, 16 December 2024

Habitual residence A Scottish patient was transferred to an English psychiatric hospital in 2015, was fit for discharge in 2017, and was eventually discharged in 2022 to a placement in England because nothing could be found in Scotland. Aberdeenshire Council sought to have a Scottish Guardianship Order recognised and enforced in England. All parties agreed that she was habitually resident in Scotland; this judgment sets out the law and explains why the judge agreed.