MM v WL Clinic (2016) UKUT 37 (AAC): Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 11:55, 8 October 2021

Conditional discharge and DOL Charles J refused permission to appeal his earlier decision (the main point of which was that, for the purposes of Article 5, a restricted patient with the capacity to do so can give a valid and effective consent to conditions of a conditional discharge that when implemented will, on an objective assessment, create a deprivation of liberty). The Secretary of State can seek permission from the Court of Appeal [and subsequently did].

Appeal status information/thanks

Court of Appeal grant of permission. On 9/3/16 the Court of Appeal granted permission because "[T]he appeal raises important points of principle which ought to be considered by this court and on which there is a real prospect of success" and directed that the hearing of the appeal be expedited. Thanks to Donald Tiong (Bison Solicitors) for providing the Court of Appeal PTA decision.

Listing news: "Lord Justice Moor-Bick has directed that [C3/2016/0561 Re MM] be expedited into the court list and be heard with C3/2015/4104 Re: PJ with a combined time estimate of 2 days. It has now been imposed into the list floating over the 8th and 9th June 2016." (Email from Civil Appeals Office, 17/3/16)

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Powers🔍

Date: 21/1/16🔍

Court: Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)🔍

Judicial history:

MM case:

SSJ v MM [2018] UKSC 60
SSJ v MM; Welsh Ministers v PJ [2017] EWCA Civ 194 (joint judgment)
MM v WL Clinic [2016] UKUT 37 (AAC) (permission to appeal refused)
MM v WL Clinic [2015] UKUT 644 (AAC)

PJ case:

Judge(s):

Charles🔍

Parties:

MM🔍
WL Clinic🔍
Secretary of State for Justice🔍

Citation number(s):

[2016] UKUT 37 (AAC)^B
[2016] MHLO 3

What links here:

Published: 28/1/16 00:16

Cached: 2025-06-09 12:11:35

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |Judicial history first case=PJ v A Local Health Board (2015) UKUT 480 (AAC)
 |Sentence=Conditional discharge and DOL
-|Summary=''Charles J refused permission to appeal his earlier decision (the main point of which was that, for the purposes of Article 5, a restricted patient with the capacity to do so can give a valid and effective consent to conditions of a conditional discharge that when implemented will, on an objective assessment, create a deprivation of liberty). The Secretary of State can seek permission from the Court of Appeal [and subsequently did].''
+|Summary=Charles J refused permission to appeal his earlier decision (the main point of which was that, for the purposes of Article 5, a restricted patient with the capacity to do so can give a valid and effective consent to conditions of a conditional discharge that when implemented will, on an objective assessment, create a deprivation of liberty). The Secretary of State can seek permission from the Court of Appeal [and subsequently did].
 |Detail===Appeal status information/thanks==
 *[[Media:MM Court of Appeal permission granted 9 Mar 2016.pdf|Court of Appeal grant of permission]]. On 9/3/16 the Court of Appeal granted permission because "[T]he appeal raises important points of principle which ought to be considered by this court and on which there is a real prospect of success" and directed that the hearing of the appeal be expedited. {{thanks|Tiong, Donald|Bison Solicitors|providing the Court of Appeal PTA decision}}