QJ v A Local Authority (2020) EWCOP 7: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Summary=''(.*)''" to "Summary=$1")
 
Line 8: Line 8:
|Parties=QJ, A Local Authority, An NHS Trust
|Parties=QJ, A Local Authority, An NHS Trust
|Sentence=Capacity and nutrition/hydration
|Sentence=Capacity and nutrition/hydration
|Summary=''QJ had capacity to decide about nutrition and hydration despite his reluctance to answer certain questions. He was in agreement with the care plan, which included (a) Fortisip; (b) weighing; (c) discharge to a care home; (d) no readmission to hospital if he refuses to accept food or water.''
|Summary=QJ had capacity to decide about nutrition and hydration despite his reluctance to answer certain questions. He was in agreement with the care plan, which included (a) Fortisip; (b) weighing; (c) discharge to a care home; (d) no readmission to hospital if he refuses to accept food or water.
|Subject=Medical treatment cases
|Subject=Medical treatment cases
|News=Yes
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2020/07/03 03:18:44 PM
|RSS pubdate=2020/07/03 03:18:44 PM
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:55, 8 October 2021

Capacity and nutrition/hydration QJ had capacity to decide about nutrition and hydration despite his reluctance to answer certain questions. He was in agreement with the care plan, which included (a) Fortisip; (b) weighing; (c) discharge to a care home; (d) no readmission to hospital if he refuses to accept food or water.

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

  • Medical treatment cases🔍

Date: 29/1/20🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 3/7/20 15:34

Cached: 2025-06-09 15:50:50