A Local Authority v TA (2021) EWCOP 22: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Summary=''(.*)''" to "Summary=$1") |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Parties=A Local Authority, TA, XA, GA, SR | |Parties=A Local Authority, TA, XA, GA, SR | ||
|Sentence=Removal of family member from home | |Sentence=Removal of family member from home | ||
|Summary= | |Summary=GA was an 87-year-old woman who lacked capacity to make decisions about her residence, health, or care needs owing to severe and deteriorating dementia. Living with her was her son TA (a controlling presence), daughter XA (visiting to assist TA), and son HA (believed to have schizophrenia). The court ordered TA and XA to leave the home, so that GA could receive social and medical care at home and have contact with other members of the family, and authorised GA's deprivation of liberty there. The court also prevented TA from returning within 100 yds, ordered him not to use GA's Motability car and not to publish information on the internet, limited his correspondence with the local authority and Official Solicitor, and made a civil restraint order for a period of two years. Committal proceedings brought by the local authority were to be considered at a future hearing. | ||
|Subject=Deprivation of liberty,Other capacity cases | |Subject=Deprivation of liberty,Other capacity cases | ||
|News=Yes | |News=Yes | ||
|RSS pubdate=2021/05/15 06:27:59 PM | |RSS pubdate=2021/05/15 06:27:59 PM | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 11:54, 8 October 2021
Removal of family member from home GA was an 87-year-old woman who lacked capacity to make decisions about her residence, health, or care needs owing to severe and deteriorating dementia. Living with her was her son TA (a controlling presence), daughter XA (visiting to assist TA), and son HA (believed to have schizophrenia). The court ordered TA and XA to leave the home, so that GA could receive social and medical care at home and have contact with other members of the family, and authorised GA's deprivation of liberty there. The court also prevented TA from returning within 100 yds, ordered him not to use GA's Motability car and not to publish information on the internet, limited his correspondence with the local authority and Official Solicitor, and made a civil restraint order for a period of two years. Committal proceedings brought by the local authority were to be considered at a future hearing.
Essex search
This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:Full judgment: BAILII
Subject(s):
Date: 19 February 2021🔍
Court: Court of Protection🔍
Judge(s):
- Cohen🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:- No pages link to this page
Published: 16/5/21 08:31
Cached: 2025-07-06 22:11:39
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: