R v Shepherd (Jack) (2002) EWCA Crim 1091: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWCA\/Crim\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii: [$1] EWCA Crim $2}}") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii: [2002] EWCA Crim 1091}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 25 April 2021
Conviction quashed and substituted with an admission order with restrictions as, had the issue been raised, on the evidence the jury would have found that the defendant was unfit to plead but had done the act.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: