View source for R v Shepherd (Jack) (2002) EWCA Crim 1091

Conviction quashed and substituted with an [[admission order]] with restrictions as, had the issue been raised, on the evidence the jury would have found that the defendant was unfit to plead but had done the act.

==External link==
{{#bailii: [2002] EWCA Crim 1091}}


[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2002 cases]]
[[Category:Unfitness and insanity cases]]