QJ v A Local Authority (2020) EWCOP 7: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Case |Date=2020/01/29 |NCN=[2020] EWCOP 7 |Court=Court of Protection |Judges=Hayden |Parties=QJ, A Local Authority, An NHS Trust |Sentence=Capacity and nutrition/hydration |...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Date=2020/01/29 | |Date=2020/01/29 | ||
|NCN=[2020] EWCOP 7 | |NCN=[2020] EWCOP 7 | ||
|Essex issue=101 | |||
|Essex page=3 | |||
|Court=Court of Protection | |Court=Court of Protection | ||
|Judges=Hayden | |Judges=Hayden | ||
Revision as of 15:34, 3 July 2020
Capacity and nutrition/hydration QJ had capacity to decide about nutrition and hydration despite his reluctance to answer certain questions. He was in agreement with the care plan, which included (a) Fortisip; (b) weighing; (c) discharge to a care home; (d) no readmission to hospital if he refuses to accept food or water.
Essex
This case has been summarised on page 3 of 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 101, February 2020).
Full judgment: BAILII
Subject(s):
- Medical treatment cases🔍
Date: 29 January 2020🔍
Court: Court of Protection🔍
Judge(s):
- Hayden🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:- 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 101, February 2020)
- QJ v A Local Authority [2020] EWCOP 3
Published: 3/7/20 15:34
Cached: 2025-06-28 10:14:20
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: