Re AR (2018) EWCOP 8: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
"The main reason why this application has been transferred to me is that it raises issues relating to the validity of the orders relied on by Mr Cawthorn to enable him to charge remuneration as a deputy."
{{Case
 
|Date=2018/03/28
==Citations==
|NCN=[2018] EWCOP 8
|Court=Court of Protection
|Judges=Charles
|Parties=AR
|Sentence=Deputy - remuneration
|Summary="The main reason why this application has been transferred to me is that it raises issues relating to the validity of the orders relied on by Mr Cawthorn to enable him to charge remuneration as a deputy."
|Detail===Citations==
Appeared on Bailii initially as [2018] EWCOP B8.
Appeared on Bailii initially as [2018] EWCOP B8.
 
|Subject=Deputyship cases
==External link==
|News=No
{{#bailii:(2018) EWCOP 8}}
|RSS pubdate=2019/3/20 10:06:16 PM
 
}}
[[Category:Deputyship cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2018 cases]]

Latest revision as of 22:06, 20 March 2019

Deputy - remuneration "The main reason why this application has been transferred to me is that it raises issues relating to the validity of the orders relied on by Mr Cawthorn to enable him to charge remuneration as a deputy."

Citations

Appeared on Bailii initially as [2018] EWCOP B8Not on Bailii!.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 28/3/18🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:
  • No pages link to this page

Published: 9/4/18 00:46

Cached: 2025-06-24 23:02:37