LF v A NHS Trust (2022) EWCOP 8: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:04, 22 July 2022

RRO G's father asked for the reporting restrictions to be discharged to allow G's story to be shared in relation to a proposed crowd-funding campaign. In applying the usual balancing exercise, the judge noted that "the Article 10 right asserted by the father is to pursue, in the public domain, an outcome which has been assessed as contrary to his daughter's interests", and concluded that the restrictions should continue.

Essex

This case has been summarised on page 29 of 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 121, April 2022).

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Reporting restriction order cases🔍 Older RRO cases can still be found in Category:Other capacity cases

Date: 7 March 2022🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judicial history:

Judge(s):

Hayden🔍

Parties:

A NHS Trust🔍
G🔍
M CCG🔍

Citation number(s):

[2022] EWCOP 8^B

What links here:

Published: 22/7/22 21:04

Cached: 2025-06-30 04:07:21

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 |Judges=Hayden
 |Parties=A NHS Trust, G, M CCG
+|Judicial history first case=A NHS Foundation Trust v G (2022) EWCOP 25
 |Sentence=RRO
 |Summary=G's father asked for the reporting restrictions to be discharged to allow G's story to be shared in relation to a proposed crowd-funding campaign. In applying the usual balancing exercise, the judge noted that "the Article 10 right asserted by the father is to pursue, in the public domain, an outcome which has been assessed as contrary to his daughter's interests", and concluded that the restrictions should continue.