D v S (2023) EWCOP 8: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:46, 29 September 2023

Divorce "There are two applications before this Court. The first to be determined (in the Court of Protection) relates to a best interests decision in respect of D, who lacks capacity in a wide sphere of decision-taking in consequence of a severe acquired brain injury. The injury which occurred in 2006, resulted in significant physical and cognitive impairment. The second application (in the Family Court), which as will become clear below, is contingent upon the decision in the first, is an application for a decree nisi of divorce."

Citation

The same judgment appears on BAILII with a second citation: [2023] EWFC 23^B.

Essex

This case has been summarised on page 8 of 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 130, March 2023).

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Other capacity cases🔍
Sex and marriage cases🔍

Date: 1 March 2023🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

Hayden🔍

Parties:

D🔍
S🔍

Citation number(s):

[2023] EWCOP 8^B
[2023] EWFC 23^B

What links here:

Published: 6/6/23 21:18

Cached: 2025-07-17 17:12:43

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |Date=2023/03/01
 |NCN=[2023] EWCOP 8
+|Essex issue=130
+|Essex page=8
+|Other citations=[2023] EWFC 23
 |Court=Court of Protection
 |Judges=Hayden
@@ Line 9: / Line 12: @@
 |Detail===Citation==
 The same judgment appears on BAILII with a second citation: [2023] EWFC 23.
-|Subject=Capacity to consent to sexual relations cases,Other capacity cases
+|Subject=Other capacity cases,Sex and marriage cases
 |News=Yes
 |RSS pubdate=2023/06/06 09:16:19 PM
 }}