LB Haringey v CM (2014) EWCOP B23: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 20:31, 12 December 2024

Non-family financial deputy "This is an objection by a family member to the London Borough of Haringey's application to be appointed as GW's deputy for property and affairs. ... I allow Haringey's application and dismiss CM's objection, and shall make an order appointing the authorised officer of Haringey Council as GW's deputy for property and affairs on the understanding that it is in GW's best interests, and less restrictive of his rights and freedom of action, for him to retain control over his own expenditure to a limit of £200 a week. I am surprised that CM persisted with her application to manage her uncle's property and finances after he had expressed such trenchant opposition to her in his interview with the Special Visitor. ... Nevertheless, GW's views have not always been consistent and this matter was listed for an attended hearing on 22 May 2014, anyway, and in the circumstances I see no reason to depart from the usual order for costs..."

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Law Newsletter' (issue 50, October 2014)

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Deputyship cases🔍 Older deputyship cases can still be found in Category:Other capacity cases

Date: 9 June 2014🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

Lush🔍

Parties:

London Borough of Haringey🔍
CM🔍
GW🔍

Citation number(s):

[2014] EWCOP B23^B
[2014] MHLO 36

What links here:

No pages link to this page

Published: 10/6/14 01:10

Cached: 2025-06-27 21:32:36

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-"This is an objection by a family member to the London Borough of Haringey's application to be appointed as GW's deputy for property and affairs. ... Accordingly, I allow Haringey's application and dismiss CM's objection, and shall make an order appointing the authorised officer of Haringey Council as GW's deputy for property and affairs on the understanding that it is in GW's best interests, and less restrictive of his rights and freedom of action, for him to retain control over his own expenditure to a limit of £200 a week. I am surprised that CM persisted with her application to manage her uncle's property and finances after he had expressed such trenchant opposition to her in his interview with the Special Visitor. ... Nevertheless, GW's views have not always been consistent and this matter was listed for an attended hearing on 22 May 2014, anyway, and in the circumstances I see no reason to depart from the usual order for costs..."
+{{Case
+|Date=2014-06-09
-==External link==
+|NCN=[2014] EWCOP B23
-{{bailii|(2014) EWCOP B23}}
+|Other citations=[2014] MHLO 36
+|Court=Court of Protection
-[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
+|Judges=Lush
-[[Category:No summary]]
+|Parties=London Borough of Haringey, CM, GW
-[[Category:Transcript]]
+|Sentence=Non-family financial deputy
-[[Category:2014 cases]]
+|Summary="This is an objection by a family member to the London Borough of Haringey's application to be appointed as GW's deputy for property and affairs. ... I allow Haringey's application and dismiss CM's objection, and shall make an order appointing the authorised officer of Haringey Council as GW's deputy for property and affairs on the understanding that it is in GW's best interests, and less restrictive of his rights and freedom of action, for him to retain control over his own expenditure to a limit of £200 a week. I am surprised that CM persisted with her application to manage her uncle's property and finances after he had expressed such trenchant opposition to her in his interview with the Special Visitor. ... Nevertheless, GW's views have not always been consistent and this matter was listed for an attended hearing on 22 May 2014, anyway, and in the circumstances I see no reason to depart from the usual order for costs..."
+|Subject=Deputyship cases
+|News=No
+|RSS pubdate=2024-12-12 08:30:21 PM
+}}