LV v UK 50718/16 [2018] MHLO 22
MHT/Parole Board delay "Complaint: The applicant complains under Article 5(4) of the Convention that she did not have a speedy review of the legality of her detention. In particular, she contends that her right to a speedy review was violated both by delays on the part of the Public Protection Casework Section and the Parole Board, and from the unnecessary two-stage Tribunal/Parole Board process. Question to the Parties: Was the review of the applicant’s detention which commenced on 24 May 2011 and concluded on 21 March 2013 conducted 'speedily' within the meaning of Article 5(4) of the Convention?" (The first paragraph of the decision is wrong as the applicant's solicitor works for Campbell Law Solicitors.)
CASES DATABASE
Full judgment: No Bailii link (neutral citation is unknown or not applicable)
Subject(s):
- ECHR deprivation of liberty cases🔍
- Prison law cases🔍 See Prison law for background information
Date: 12/3/18🔍
Court: European Court of Human Rights🔍
Judicial history:
Parties:
Citation number(s):
- [2018] MHLO 22
- LV v UK 50718/16 [2019] MHLO 32 (ECHR)
- Prison law
- R (LV) v SSJ [2014] EWHC 1495 (Admin)
- R v LV; R (LV) v SSJ [2015] EWCA Crim 45, [2015] EWCA Civ 56
- The ECHR and mental health law
Published: 21/4/18 22:48
Cached: 2022-05-28 23:29:54