Information for "Re AB (ADRT: Validity and applicability) (2025) EWCOP 20 (T3)"
Basic information
| Display title | Re AB (ADRT: Validity and applicability) [2025] EWCOP 20 (T3) |
| Default sort key | Re AB (ADRT: Validity and applicability) (2025) EWCOP 20 (T3) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 959 |
| Page ID | 16502 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 09:36, 12 June 2025 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 15:10, 6 October 2025 |
| Total number of edits | 2 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 1 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Page properties
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "This case demonstrates difficulties that can arise when: (a) An individual who has made an ADRT does not provide it to a healthcare professional or make clear arrangements for it to be brought to the attention of clinicians in the event that they lose capacity to make decisions about their own medical treatment. (b) The authenticity, validity and applicability of an apparent ADRT are the subject of dispute amongst the individual's loved ones and family. (c) An ADRT which is the subject of dispute or doubt is not brought promptly to the attention of lawyers, Mental Capacity Act specialists, or the Court of Protection." |