Ambreen Malik [2021] MHLO 8 (MPT)

Revision as of 22:30, 2 December 2024 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case |Date=2021-07-15 |Court=Medical Practitioners Tribunal |Parties=Ambreen Malik |Judicial history first case=Dr A Malik v CAS (Cygnet) Behavioural Health Ltd (2021) UKET 2403141/2018 |Sentence=Fitness to practise and covert medication |Summary=The Medical Practitioners Tribunal, in this misconduct case, decided that the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired: "The Tribunal was of the view that Dr Malik was acting in the best interests of Patient A and her mot...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Fitness to practise and covert medication The Medical Practitioners Tribunal, in this misconduct case, decided that the doctor's fitness to practise was not impaired: "The Tribunal was of the view that Dr Malik was acting in the best interests of Patient A and her motivation was solely to improve the health of Patient A so he could return to the community and avoid being admitted to the PICU. The Tribunal were agreed that at the time, Dr Malik genuinely believed that the only option she had to gain the best outcome for Patient A was for covert administration of ZD."

External links