R (C) v SSJ [2014] EWCA Civ 1009

Anonymity The Administrative Court had not been wrong to refuse the patient an anonymity order in relation to his judicial review of the Secretary of State's decision about unescorted community leave.

Note

This judgment was finally published in 2023 after the Supreme Court secretariat had been asked about it for several years.

External links

• Guardian, 'Murderer not entitled to remain anonymous while seeking rehabilitation' (Press Association, 16/7/14)

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

• Anonymisation cases🔍

Date: 16/7/14🔍

Court: Court of Appeal (Civil Division)🔍

Judicial history:

• R (C) v SSJ [2016] UKSC 2
• R (C) v SSJ [2014] EWCA Civ 1009
• R (C) v SSJ [2014] EWHC 167 (Admin)

Judge(s):

• Dyson🔍
• Maurice Kay🔍
• Floyd🔍

Parties:

• X🔍
• C🔍
• Secretary of State for Justice🔍

Citation number(s):

• [2014] EWCA Civ 1009^B
• [2014] MHLO 90

What links here:

• R (C) v SSJ [2016] UKSC 2
• Jonathan Wilson, 'Mental health: update' (Legal Action, February 2017)
• R (C) v SSJ [2014] EWHC 167 (Admin)

Published: 11/8/14 20:01

Cached: 2025-05-20 18:25:27