FS v RS and JS [2020] EWFC 63

Revision as of 09:51, 20 September 2021 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case |Date=2020/09/30 |NCN=[2020] EWFC 63 |Court=Family Court |Judges=Munby |Parties=FS, RS, JS |Sentence=Inherent jurisdiction and money |Summary=''The 41-year-old applican...")
(diff) โ† Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision โ†’ (diff)
Inherent jurisdiction and money The 41-year-old applicant sought financial relief against his parents (who had reduced their financial support) pursuant to s27 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, sch 1 Children Act 1989 and "that branch of the recently rediscovered inherent jurisdiction which applies in relation to adults who, though not lacking capacity, are 'vulnerable'". His argument on the inherent jurisdiction failed: (a) his claim lay far outside its accepted paramaters; (b) it cannot be used to compel an unwilling third party to provide money or services; (c) it is ousted by any relevant statutory scheme.

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 30/9/20๐Ÿ”

Court: Family Court๐Ÿ”

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 20/9/21 09:51

Cached: 2025-06-04 22:55:20