R (N) v MHRT [2007] EWHC 1524 (Admin)

Revision as of 19:17, 26 April 2021 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "{{caselaw-stub}}" to "")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The Tribunal must ask (1) is the patient suffering from psychopathic disorder (see s1(2))? If yes, (2) is that finding based solely on the fact of sexual deviancy (see s1(3))? Behaviour exhibited when exhibiting sexual deviancy may in part be basis for diagnosis. In this case, there were also separate symptoms. The decision not to adjourn was lawful

External links

BAILII