R v Osborne [2010] EWCA Crim 547

Revision as of 11:19, 25 April 2021 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWCA\/Crim\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii: [$1] EWCA Crim $2}}")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

It was neither necessary nor expedient in the interests of justice to admit fresh evidence that the claimant suffered from ADHD: it would not afford any ground for allowing the appeal against conviction on the basis of diminished responsibility.

External link

BAILII