Tinsley v Manchester City Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1704

Revision as of 21:55, 8 November 2017 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with ""The question in this appeal is whether a person who has been compulsorily detained in a hospital for mental disorder under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and has the...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

"The question in this appeal is whether a person who has been compulsorily detained in a hospital for mental disorder under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and has then been released from detention but still requires "after-care services" is entitled to require his local authority to provide such services at any time before he has exhausted sums reflecting the costs of care awarded to him in a judgment in his favour against a negligent tortfeasor."

Related judgments

External link

BAILII