MM v WL Clinic [2016] UKUT 37 (AAC)

Revision as of 00:16, 28 January 2016 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''Charles J refused permission to appeal his earlier decision (the main point of which was that, for the purposes of Article 5, a restricted patient with the capacity to do so...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Charles J refused permission to appeal his earlier decision (the main point of which was that, for the purposes of Article 5, a restricted patient with the capacity to do so can give a valid and effective consent to conditions of a conditional discharge that when implemented will, on an objective assessment, create a deprivation of liberty). The Secretary of State can seek permission from the Court of Appeal.

Related judgments

External link

OSSCSC. Judgment.

...

At the time of writing, the wrong judgment is on Bailii (not their fault)