CYC v PC and NC [2012] MHLO 103 (COP)

Revision as of 20:51, 24 October 2012 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''(1) PC lacked capacity to litigate and lacked capacity to decide whether to resume married life with NC (upon the expiry of a 13-year sentence for his sexual offences agains...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

(1) PC lacked capacity to litigate and lacked capacity to decide whether to resume married life with NC (upon the expiry of a 13-year sentence for his sexual offences against previous wives). (2) The resumption of married life with NC was lawful as being in her best interests.

Other

Date: 20/7/12

Before: Hedley J

Jonathan Butler (instructed by Switalskis)

Joe O'Brien (instructed by Langleys)

Conrad Hallin (instructed by LA Legal Services).

External link

Not on Bailii at time of writing.