Lumba (WL) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 12

Revision as of 19:09, 30 April 2011 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''(1) It was unlawful in public law for the SSHD to operate an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which differed from the published policy and whic...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

(1) It was unlawful in public law for the SSHD to operate an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which differed from the published policy and which amounted to a near-blanket ban on release. (2) The detention of the appellants was unlawful, even though they would have been detained even on the published policy. (3) As they suffered no loss, the appellants were entitled to nominal damages of one pound (and not 'vindicatory' or exemplary damages).

External link

...