G v E [2010] EWCA Civ 822

Revision as of 00:30, 18 July 2010 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with '''The judge was right to reject the appellant's submission that Article 5 places distinct threshold conditions which have to be satisfied before a person lacking capacity can…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The judge was right to reject the appellant's submission that Article 5 places distinct threshold conditions which have to be satisfied before a person lacking capacity can be detained in his best interests under the MCA 2005. The MCA generally, and the DOLS in particular, plug the Bournewood gap and are Article 5 compliant.

External link

Bailii