R v Osborne [2010] EWCA Crim 547

Revision as of 22:37, 26 March 2010 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with '''It was neither necessary nor expedient in the interests of justice to admit fresh evidence that the claimant suffered from ADHD: it would not afford any ground for allowing the…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

It was neither necessary nor expedient in the interests of justice to admit fresh evidence that the claimant suffered from ADHD: it would not afford any ground for allowing the appeal against conviction on the basis of diminished responsibility.

External link

Bailii