R (N) v SSH; R (E) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 795

Revision as of 14:07, 26 July 2009 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with '''The right or freedom to smoke does not engage Article 8(1); Article 14 could not therefore be relied upon either. In any event, the SSH's smoke-free regulations and the...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The right or freedom to smoke does not engage Article 8(1); Article 14 could not therefore be relied upon either. In any event, the SSH's smoke-free regulations and the Trust's smoke-free policy would be justified under Article 8(2), and the different treatment under the regulations for mental health units compared with prisons, care homes and hospices would be justified under Article 14.

Related judgments

R (N) v SSH; R (E) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 795

  • R (G) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2008] EWHC 1096 (Admin)

External link

Bailii