Varbanov v Bulgaria 31365/96 [2000] ECHR 457

Revision as of 21:52, 10 April 2009 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with '''(1) Violation of Article 5(1): Deprivation of liberty was not justified under Art 5(1)(e) and had no basis in domestic law which, moreover, did not provide the required pro...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

(1) Violation of Article 5(1): Deprivation of liberty was not justified under Art 5(1)(e) and had no basis in domestic law which, moreover, did not provide the required protection against arbitrariness as it did not require the seeking of a medical opinion. (2) Violation Article 5(3): The applicant could only appeal to prosecutors and so was deprived of his right to have the lawfulness of his detention reviewed by a court.

External link

Bailii

Detailed summary on 1COR website