R (Ashworth) v MHRT; R (H) v Ashworth [2001] EWHC Admin 901

Revision as of 19:07, 25 April 2021 by Jonathan (talk | contribs)

JR of MHRT discharge: immediate discharge when no aftercare available; decision irrational; reasons inadequate. JR of subsequent re-sectioning: lawful, considering Brandenburg CA decision; legal advice on lawfulness of MHRT decision relevant; stay ineffective when discharge was immediate.

Related cases

See Court of Appeal judgment in this case: R (Ashworth) v MHRT; R (H) v Ashworth [2002] EWCA Civ 923

External links

BAILII