R v Osborne [2010] EWCA Crim 547

Revision as of 21:33, 26 May 2015 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "")

It was neither necessary nor expedient in the interests of justice to admit fresh evidence that the claimant suffered from ADHD: it would not afford any ground for allowing the appeal against conviction on the basis of diminished responsibility.

External link

Bailii