R v Osborne [2010] EWCA Crim 547

Revision as of 14:42, 8 January 2012 by J-bot (talk | contribs) (Robot: Adding category Diminished responsibility cases)

It was neither necessary nor expedient in the interests of justice to admit fresh evidence that the claimant suffered from ADHD: it would not afford any ground for allowing the appeal against conviction on the basis of diminished responsibility.

External link

Bailii