R (Munday) v SSJ [2009] EWHC 3638 (Admin)

Revision as of 21:26, 26 May 2015 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "")

The MoJ's decision to recall the claimant, although contrary to the RMO's advice, was not Wednesbury unreasonable or otherwise flawed on conventional public law grounds: the disagreement was not on medical grounds but on whether, given the history of arson and recent disengagement, a mere allegation of and arrest for arson was sufficient justification for recall.

External link

...