R (C) v SSHD (2002) EWCA Civ 647: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[Category:Ministry of Justice]] | [[Category:Ministry of Justice]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | |||
[[Category:Transcript]] | |||
[[Category:2002 cases]] | |||
Revision as of 09:37, 8 October 2008
HO could not exercise discretion to refer case under s71 after MHRT without good reason; evidence lacking at MHRT hearing was not good reason on the facts; following IH (CA) MHRT remains fully seised of case after a D/C/D; decision to refer quashed. (rough summary)
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: