R (LI) v MHRT (2004) EWHC 51 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Successful reasons challenge. | |||
==Other== | |||
"The misgivings I have stem from the Tribunal merely stating, without more explanation, that it had 'reflected upon the fact that the index offences were attributable both to the Applicant's mental condition at the time and also his attitude (divorced from any illness) to women generally'." (para 18) | "The misgivings I have stem from the Tribunal merely stating, without more explanation, that it had 'reflected upon the fact that the index offences were attributable both to the Applicant's mental condition at the time and also his attitude (divorced from any illness) to women generally'." (para 18) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Reasons]] | [[Category:Reasons]] | ||
[[Category:No summary]] | |||
[[Category:Transcript]] | |||
[[Category:2004 cases]] | |||
Revision as of 09:27, 8 October 2008
Successful reasons challenge.
Other
"The misgivings I have stem from the Tribunal merely stating, without more explanation, that it had 'reflected upon the fact that the index offences were attributable both to the Applicant's mental condition at the time and also his attitude (divorced from any illness) to women generally'." (para 18)
"In my judgment the original reasons were inadequate because they did not disclose what was meant by 'reflected'. Further, I entertain some limited misgivings about..." (para 25).
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: