R (Ashworth) v MHRT; R (H) v Ashworth (2001) EWHC Admin 901: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''JR of MHRT discharge: immediate discharge when no aftercare available; decision irrational; reasons inadequate. JR of subsequent re-sectioning: lawful, considering Brandenburg CA decision; legal advice on lawfulness of MHRT decision relevant; stay ineffective when discharge was immediate.'' | ''JR of MHRT discharge: immediate discharge when no aftercare available; decision irrational; reasons inadequate. JR of subsequent re-sectioning: lawful, considering Brandenburg CA decision; legal advice on lawfulness of MHRT decision relevant; stay ineffective when discharge was immediate.'' | ||
==Related cases== | |||
See Court of Appeal judgment in this case: [[R (Ashworth) v MHRT; R (H) v Ashworth (2002) EWCA Civ 923]] | See Court of Appeal judgment in this case: [[R (Ashworth) v MHRT; R (H) v Ashworth (2002) EWCA Civ 923]] | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
[http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2001/901.html Bailii] | [http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2001/901.html Bailii] | ||
{{caselaw-stub}} | {{caselaw-stub}} | ||
[[Category: Re-sectioning after hearing]] | [[Category: Re-sectioning after hearing]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | |||
[[Category:Transcript]] | |||
[[Category:2001 cases]] | |||
Revision as of 09:22, 8 October 2008
JR of MHRT discharge: immediate discharge when no aftercare available; decision irrational; reasons inadequate. JR of subsequent re-sectioning: lawful, considering Brandenburg CA decision; legal advice on lawfulness of MHRT decision relevant; stay ineffective when discharge was immediate.
Related cases
See Court of Appeal judgment in this case: R (Ashworth) v MHRT; R (H) v Ashworth [2002] EWCA Civ 923
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: