O v P (2024) EWHC 1077 (Fam): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Judges=Judd | |Judges=Judd | ||
|Parties=O, P, Q | |Parties=O, P, Q | ||
|Judicial history=*[[O v P (2024) EWCA Civ 1577]] | |||
*[[O v P (2024) EWHC 1077 (Fam)]] | |||
|Sentence=Gender dysphoria | |Sentence=Gender dysphoria | ||
|Summary="In this case I am considering applications with respect to a young person who has just attained the age of 16. The mother has applied for a prohibited steps order (PSO) pursuant to section 8 Children Act 1989 and for court to make a best interests declaration under the Inherent Jurisdiction. The father has applied for interim orders to be discharged and the proceedings to come to an end." | |Summary="In this case I am considering applications with respect to a young person who has just attained the age of 16. The mother has applied for a prohibited steps order (PSO) pursuant to section 8 Children Act 1989 and for court to make a best interests declaration under the Inherent Jurisdiction. The father has applied for interim orders to be discharged and the proceedings to come to an end." | ||
|External links=* {{link | |External links=* {{link | ||
|text=St John's Chambers, 'O v P (2024) EWHC 1077 (Fam)' (8/5/24) | |text=St John's Chambers, 'O v P (2024) EWHC 1077 (Fam)' (8/5/24) |
Latest revision as of 21:25, 14 February 2025
Gender dysphoria "In this case I am considering applications with respect to a young person who has just attained the age of 16. The mother has applied for a prohibited steps order (PSO) pursuant to section 8 Children Act 1989 and for court to make a best interests declaration under the Inherent Jurisdiction. The father has applied for interim orders to be discharged and the proceedings to come to an end."
External links
- St John's Chambers, 'O v P [2024] EWHC 1077 (Fam)' (8/5/24) . Brief summary and appeal status.
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: