Varinder Ghaiwal (2022) MHLO 4 (SDT): Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case
{{Case
|Date=2022/01/10
|Date=2022-01-10
|Other citations=Case no 12254-2021
|Other citations=Case no 12254-2021
|Court=Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
|Court=Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
Line 10: Line 10:
** The link above doesn't quite work because the URL contains an odd character. Copy and paste this instead: <code><nowiki>https://www.solicitorstribunal.org.uk/sites/default/files-sdt/12254.2021.Ghaiwal%20.pdf</nowiki></code>
** The link above doesn't quite work because the URL contains an odd character. Copy and paste this instead: <code><nowiki>https://www.solicitorstribunal.org.uk/sites/default/files-sdt/12254.2021.Ghaiwal%20.pdf</nowiki></code>
** Alternatively, just click the green archive icon.
** Alternatively, just click the green archive icon.
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]
|Subject=Other LPA cases
|Subject=Other LPA cases
|News=Yes
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2022/11/22 02:30:56 PM
|RSS pubdate=2022-11-22 02:30:56 PM
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 13:11, 12 December 2024

Solicitor fined over LPAs Varinder Ghaiwal was fined £6,000 (plus £11,000 costs) for, while acting as certificate provider in respect of a client's two LPAs, failing to verify instructions and failing to ensure that the client understood the purpose of the LPA and/or the scope of the authority they provided. The case arose after the police made a report to the SRA concerning an ongoing investigation into the elderly man's financial affairs. The SRA commissioned an expert report which concluded: "Mr Ghaiwal’s case is that he was a witness, however he was far, far more than that: a certificate provider. His failure to recognise this and therefore his failure to recognise the resulting duties and responsibilities meant that there was an egregious breach of his obligations to [the client]".

External links

  • Decision on SDT website
    • The link above doesn't quite work because the URL contains an odd character. Copy and paste this instead: https://www.solicitorstribunal.org.uk/sites/default/files-sdt/12254.2021.Ghaiwal%20.pdf
    • Alternatively, just click the green archive icon.

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: No Bailii link (neutral citation is unknown or not applicable)

Subject(s):

  • Other LPA cases🔍

Date: 10 January 2022🔍

Court: Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

  • Varinder Ghaiwal🔍
  • Ian McLachlan🔍
  • Solicitors Regulation Authority🔍

Citation number(s):

  • Case no 12254-2021

What links here:

Published: 22/11/22 14:45

Cached: 2025-07-05 20:46:28