Stott v Leadec Ltd (2020) UKEAT 263/19: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Summary=''(.*)''" to "Summary=$1") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case | {{Case | ||
|Date=2020 | |Date=2020-02-20 | ||
|NCN=[2020] UKEAT 0263_19_2002 | |NCN=[2020] UKEAT 0263_19_2002 | ||
|Court=Employment Appeal Tribunal | |Court=Employment Appeal Tribunal | ||
|Judges= | |Judges=Ellenbogen | ||
|Parties=Stott, Leadec Ltd | |Parties=Stott, Leadec Ltd | ||
|Sentence=EAT capacity and litigation friend | |Sentence=EAT capacity and litigation friend | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Subject=Litigation friend cases | |Subject=Litigation friend cases | ||
|News=Yes | |News=Yes | ||
|RSS pubdate=2020 | |RSS pubdate=2020-08-29 05:20:01 PM | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 12:54, 21 October 2024
EAT capacity and litigation friend The Employment Appeal Tribunal adjourned for a medical report on litigation capacity and commented on the continuing lack of rules rules containing clearly defined powers in relation to proceedings involving protected parties (as defined in Part 21 of the CPR) in employment tribunals and in the EAT.
Essex search
This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: