Stott v Leadec Ltd (2020) UKEAT 263/19: Difference between revisions

m (Text replacement - "Summary=''(.*)''" to "Summary=$1")
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case
{{Case
|Date=2020/02/20
|Date=2020-02-20
|NCN=[2020] UKEAT 0263_19_2002
|NCN=[2020] UKEAT 0263_19_2002
|Court=Employment Appeal Tribunal
|Court=Employment Appeal Tribunal
|Judges=Naomi Ellenbogen
|Judges=Ellenbogen
|Parties=Stott, Leadec Ltd
|Parties=Stott, Leadec Ltd
|Sentence=EAT capacity and litigation friend
|Sentence=EAT capacity and litigation friend
Line 9: Line 9:
|Subject=Litigation friend cases
|Subject=Litigation friend cases
|News=Yes
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2020/08/29 05:20:01 PM
|RSS pubdate=2020-08-29 05:20:01 PM
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:54, 21 October 2024

EAT capacity and litigation friend The Employment Appeal Tribunal adjourned for a medical report on litigation capacity and commented on the continuing lack of rules rules containing clearly defined powers in relation to proceedings involving protected parties (as defined in Part 21 of the CPR) in employment tribunals and in the EAT.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

  • Litigation friend cases🔍

Date: 20 February 2020🔍

Court: Employment Appeal Tribunal🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

  • [2020] UKEAT 0263_19_2002

What links here:
  • No pages link to this page

Published: 29/8/20 17:25

Cached: 2025-06-28 12:14:26