Re L; K v LBX (2012) EWCA Civ 79: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''[[Article 8]] does not require that maintenance of existing family life arrangements be a 'starting point' in best interests decisions.''
{{Case
 
|Date=2012/02/08
==Related judgments==
|NCN=[2012] EWCA Civ 79
{{related judgments|LBX v K, L and M (2010) EWHC 2422 (COP)}}
|Other citations=[2012] MHLO 7
 
|Court=Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
==Other==
|Judges=Thorpe, Black, Davis
Hearing: 19/12/11
|Parties=K, LBX, L, M
 
|Judicial history first case=LBX v K, L and M (2010) EWHC 2422 (COP)
Judgment: 8/2/12
|Sentence=Residence and best interests starting point
 
|Summary=[[Article 8]] does not require that maintenance of existing family life arrangements be a 'starting point' in best interests decisions.
Before: Thorpe, Black, Davis LJJ
|Detail===Case title==
 
Hilton Harrop-Griffiths (instructed by LBX Legal Department) for Respondent 1
 
Victoria Butler-Cole (instructed by Steel & Shamash) for Respondent 2
 
Respondent 3 did not appear and was unrepresented
 
==Citations==
K v (1) LBX (2) L (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) (3) M [2012] EWCA Civ 79
K v (1) LBX (2) L (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) (3) M [2012] EWCA Civ 79
 
|Subject=Best interests
[2012] MHLO 7
|News=No
 
|RSS pubdate=2023-7-27 10:35:09 PM
==External link==
}}
{{#bailii:(2012) EWCA Civ 79}}
 
[[Category:Best interests]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]

Latest revision as of 22:35, 27 July 2023

Residence and best interests starting point Article 8 does not require that maintenance of existing family life arrangements be a 'starting point' in best interests decisions.

Case title

K v (1) LBX (2) L (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) (3) M (2012) EWCA Civ 79B

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters: